Skip to content

Conversation

ragesoss
Copy link
Contributor

@ragesoss ragesoss commented Jun 5, 2017

The error message for InvalidPluralizationData should include the missing key that triggered the error. For non-default pluralization rules like the CLDR rules for many languages, the sought-for key will not be obvious from the count.

Also, the force_invalid_pluralization_data method in exceptions_test was not actually raising an exception, so a few assertions that relied on it were not being tested.

The error message for InvalidPluralizationData should include the missing key that triggered the error. For non-default pluralization rules like the CLDR rules for many languages, the sought-for key will not be obvious from the count.

Also, the force_invalid_pluralization_data method in exceptions_test was not actually raising an exception, so a few assertions that relied on it were not being tested.
@radar
Copy link
Collaborator

radar commented Jul 6, 2017

Looks good to me. Thank you for taking the time to do this, @ragesoss.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants