Replies: 5 comments 7 replies
-
|
For #3 Making the language more consistent - As a mitmproxy user, I want to add a WireGuard server. - I think #7 - As a mitmproxy user, I want to see startup/configuration failures for proxy modes. - (and maybe others) would have applicability for mitmdump as well. Some of these are more advanced so maybe could be put in a different location. Also I see the tab list went from File | Start | Options to File | Capture | View | Options |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
First Mockup for the new tab Capture, let me know what you like and what you don't. Any thoughts?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I like it! As the only thing I'd make the difference between Current Setting and Capture more traffic, maybe with a color, otherwise they all seem to be "selectable" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
another option we can adopt: A problem with the previous one was that if we changed the mode on-the-fly, the order of the list changed. In this way, we can maintain the order and just apply different colors to indicate when a mode is activated and when it is simply selected. Any opinions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
this version is my favorite one |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
probably mine as well 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure if I like the list of big buttons too much. How do you feel about something like this (also in Figma)? 
Maybe we can add illustrative icons or something like that, that'd make it really nice. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I like it but, maybe, with this solutions is not clear that some options are mutually exclusive |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can you clarify what you mean by "some options are mutually exclusive"? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Probably just some source of inspiration for mitmproxy. I've been using HTTP Toolkit for a while and I really like that you have more options. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@roniemartinez: Thanks! This actually brings up some interesting ideas. I think we totally could add a "Start a fresh preconfigured Chrome instance" button right below the "Explicit HTTP(S) Proxy" configuration in a future step. :) We do have the backend functionality for that already, so it would be easy to implement. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The first project @lups2000 will be tackling for GSoC is adding a new tab in mitmweb to enable users to configure the proxy mode from within mitmweb. Basically we want to transform the mitmweb top bar from this:
to something like this:
The idea here is that when someone opens mitmweb for the first time, they are presented with a screen where they can dynamically turn on local redirect mode, WireGuard mode, spawn an additional reverse proxy, etc. A major driving factor for this is to improve the onboarding experience.
User Stories
We plan to do some mockups for the proxy mode tab, but maybe it's useful to collect some requirements / user stories first. I'll start with some ideas, please everyone chime in!
a) As a user who is interested in a local application, I want an easy path towards intercepting that traffic.
b) As a user who is interested in a device's traffic, I want an easy path towards intercepting that traffic.
Nice to have, but probably not required:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions