Skip to content

Use atomic bool #4886

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Use atomic bool #4886

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

me-cs
Copy link
Contributor

@me-cs me-cs commented May 22, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.87179% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.42%. Comparing base (8690859) to head (fdd7c83).
Report is 335 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
core/logx/logs.go 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
core/stat/usage.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
core/discov/subscriber.go 84.87% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
core/load/adaptiveshedder.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/load/sheddingstat.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/stat/metrics.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/stores/mon/options.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/stores/mon/util.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/stores/sqlx/stmt.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/syncx/atomicbool.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core/logx/logs.go 99.07% <0.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
core/stat/usage.go 60.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@me-cs me-cs marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2025 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant