Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f36081 and ba5cf96.

• kms.go (2 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/create_key.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/delete_key.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/get_public_key.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/get_signing_algorithms.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/models.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/sign_data.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/verify_data.go (1 hunks)
• packages/errors/api.go (2 hunks)
• packages/util/helper.go (2 hunks)
• test/kms_signing_test.go (1 hunks)

packages/util/helper.go (3)

87-88: Good addition of ReqId field for better error tracking

The inclusion of a ReqId field in the ErrorResponse struct enhances error traceability by capturing a unique identifier for each request, which is especially useful for debugging in distributed systems.

---

90-93: Special handling for validation errors

Good approach to return the entire response body for HTTP 422 (Unprocessable Entity) status codes. This preserves validation error details that might have a different structure than standard error responses.

---

106-124: Well-implemented ReqId extraction function

The TryExtractReqId function follows good practices:

• Performs null and error checks before processing
• Uses a minimal struct for unmarshaling only what's needed
• Handles errors gracefully

While there's some code duplication with TryParseErrorBody, the separation allows for more flexibility in how error components are extracted.

packages/errors/api.go (3)

17-17: Good addition of ReqId field to APIError struct

The inclusion of the ReqId field in the APIError struct is consistent with the changes in helper.go and enhances error tracking capabilities.

---

22-23: Improved error message with request ID

Including the request ID in the formatted error message improves debuggability by providing a unique identifier that can be used to trace errors through logs and monitoring systems.

Also applies to: 27-28

---

49-50: Good integration of request ID extraction

Properly leveraging the new TryExtractReqId utility function to populate the APIError struct with the request ID from the response.

Also applies to: 59-59

packages/api/kms/sign_data.go (3)

1-9: Good package and import organization

The package declaration and imports are well-organized. The imports include only what's necessary for the functionality provided.

---

10-11: Good use of constant for operation name

Using a constant for the operation name ensures consistency throughout the code and makes it easier to update if needed.

---

12-29: Well-implemented KMS sign data function

The function follows best practices:

• Initializes an empty response structure
• Properly constructs the request with correct URL formatting
• Handles both request errors and API errors appropriately
• Returns the result with proper error handling

The implementation is clean and follows the standard pattern used in the SDK.

packages/api/kms/get_public_key.go (3)

1-9: Good package and import organization

The package declaration and imports are well-organized, including only what's necessary for the function's implementation.

---

10-11: Good use of constant for operation name

Using a constant for the operation name ensures consistency across the codebase and makes it easier to update if needed.

---

12-28: Well-implemented KMS public key retrieval function

The function follows the same robust pattern as other API calls in the SDK:

• Initializes an empty response structure
• Makes the HTTP GET request with proper URL formatting
• Handles both request errors and API errors appropriately
• Returns the populated response with proper error handling

This implementation is clean, consistent with the SDK's patterns, and properly handles error cases.

packages/api/kms/delete_key.go (1)

12-29: Verify handling of nil httpClient parameter.

The function doesn't check if httpClient is nil before using it. This could potentially lead to a panic if a nil client is passed.

Consider adding a nil check at the beginning of the function:

func CallKmsDeleteKeyV1(httpClient *resty.Client, request KmsDeleteKeyV1Request) (KmsDeleteKeyV1Response, error) {
+	if httpClient == nil {
+		return KmsDeleteKeyV1Response{}, errors.NewRequestError(callKmsDeleteKeyOperationV1, fmt.Errorf("httpClient cannot be nil"))
+	}
	kmsDeleteKeyResponse := KmsDeleteKeyV1Response{}
	
	res, err := httpClient.R().
		SetResult(&kmsDeleteKeyResponse).
		SetBody(request).
		Delete(fmt.Sprintf("/v1/kms/keys/%s", request.KeyId))

packages/api/kms/create_key.go (1)

10-27: Verify handling of nil httpClient parameter.

The function doesn't check if httpClient is nil before using it. This could potentially lead to a panic if a nil client is passed.

Consider adding a nil check at the beginning of the function:

func CallKmsCreateKeyV1(httpClient *resty.Client, request KmsCreateKeyV1Request) (KmsCreateKeyV1Response, error) {
+	if httpClient == nil {
+		return KmsCreateKeyV1Response{}, errors.NewRequestError(callKmsCreateKeyOperationV1, fmt.Errorf("httpClient cannot be nil"))
+	}
	kmsCreateKeyResponse := KmsCreateKeyV1Response{}
	
	res, err := httpClient.R().
		SetResult(&kmsCreateKeyResponse).
		SetBody(request).
		Post("/v1/kms/keys")

packages/api/kms/verify_data.go (2)

12-29: Verify handling of nil httpClient parameter.

The function doesn't check if httpClient is nil before using it. This could potentially lead to a panic if a nil client is passed.

Consider adding a nil check at the beginning of the function:

func CallKmsVerifyDataV1(httpClient *resty.Client, request KmsVerifyDataV1Request) (KmsVerifyDataV1Response, error) {
+	if httpClient == nil {
+		return KmsVerifyDataV1Response{}, errors.NewRequestError(callKmsVerifyDataOperationV1, fmt.Errorf("httpClient cannot be nil"))
+	}
	kmsVerifyDataResponse := KmsVerifyDataV1Response{}
	
	res, err := httpClient.R().
		SetResult(&kmsVerifyDataResponse).
		SetBody(request).
		Post(fmt.Sprintf("/v1/kms/keys/%s/verify", request.KeyId))

---

17-18:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Check for redundant KeyId in request body.

The KeyId is included in both the URL path and potentially in the request body (through SetBody(request)). This might be redundant if the backend API doesn't expect it in both places.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how the request is processed in the backend

# Find references to the verify endpoint in the codebase
rg -A 3 "keys/.*?/verify" --glob "*.go"

Length of output: 342

---

Backend Redundancy Check – Validate the Inclusion of KeyId

The endpoint URL is constructed with the KeyId, but the entire request object (via SetBody(request)) is also sent in the body. This raises the possibility that the KeyId might be redundantly present. Before proceeding, please verify that the backend API is intended to extract the KeyId solely from the URL. If the API does not require the KeyId in the request body, consider removing it from the body to avoid any potential conflicts or confusion.

packages/api/kms/get_signing_algorithms.go (1)

13-29: Looks consistent and correct.
This function follows the established pattern for REST calls, properly handles errors, and returns a well-defined response.

kms.go (10)

13-20: Type aliasing for request structs looks good.
These aliases cleanly expose the API request types without requiring direct imports from the api package.

---

22-28: Result type aliases are well-defined.
Exporting these aliases similarly keeps the codebase modular and consistent.

---

29-39: Interfaces provide clear abstraction layers.
The methods in KmsKeysInterface and KmsSigningInterface are well-scoped for key-management and signing operations.

---

45-47: Structural changes for Kms and KmsKeys are coherent.
Introducing these fields and structs sets the foundation for extended KMS functionality in a maintainable way.

Also applies to: 49-59

---

63-71: Create/Delete methods are properly implemented.
They follow the same error-handling pattern as other KMS functions, returning typed results.

Also applies to: 73-81

---

83-91: SignData method is straightforward and aligns with project conventions.
It makes a single API call and surfaces errors appropriately.

---

93-101: VerifyData method follows the same reliable pattern.
Error handling is consistent, and it returns typed results for clarity.

---

103-111: ListSigningAlgorithms method is well-structured.
It correctly delegates to the API call, providing minimal overhead and consistent error handling.

---

113-121: GetPublicKey method is properly wired.
No issues with returning the public key string or handling errors.

---

158-162: Constructor is consistent and clear.
This neatly instantiates and wires up the new Kms fields.

packages/api/kms/models.go (1)

21-103: Data struct definitions are well-formed.
Each request/response type is clearly documented and mapped, making it easy to consume in higher-level code.

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af1d7f3 and 480a04a.

• kms.go (2 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/get_key_by_id.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/get_key_by_name.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/models.go (1 hunks)

packages/api/kms/get_key_by_name.go (1)

1-11: Package and imports are consistent.
No issues found regarding the package name api or the imported libraries. They are aligned with the existing project structure and are suitable for this functionality.

packages/api/kms/get_key_by_id.go (1)

1-11: Package and imports are consistent.
Similarly, the package name api and imported libraries are in line with the rest of the codebase. There are no immediate issues here.

kms.go (17)

9-31: Type aliases are straightforward.
These type aliases provide readability by exposing the underlying request/response structs from the api package as higher-level options/results. No issues observed with these mappings.

---

33-38: Interface methods for key retrieval are clearly named.
The methods GetByName and GetById in KmsKeysInterface are self-explanatory and align with the new API calls. Ensure that the implementing methods log or handle possible user input edge cases internally (e.g., empty fields).

---

40-45: KmsSigningInterface design is consistent.
Listing algorithms, retrieving public keys, signing, and verifying data are logically grouped. The interface is concise and well-defined.

---

51-52: "Keys()" and "Signing()" methods add clarity.
Exposing KmsKeysInterface and KmsSigningInterface through separate methods clarifies grouping of operations around keys vs. signing features.

---

55-59: Struct fields match the interface references.
Kms holds references to KmsKeys and KmsSigning for easy access. This is a clean pattern for organizing related functionalities.

---

61-67: KmsKeys & KmsSigning struct definitions are minimal and consistent.
No immediate concerns; each struct holding a client is aligned with the established pattern.

---

69-77: Create key function is straightforward.
Delegating to api.CallKmsCreateKeyV1 is consistent with the rest of the project. No issues noted.

---

79-87: Delete key function is consistent.
Checks if an error occurred, then returns properly. No concerns.

---

89-97: GetByName method references the newly introduced API call.
Code structure matches the pattern established in the create/delete functions, returning res.Key if no error occurs.

---

99-107: GetById method references the new call by ID.
Logic is analogous to GetByName. It keeps the method consistent with the rest of the code.

---

109-117: SignData is properly delegated.
Returns the entire api.KmsSignDataV1Response rather than just the signature, allowing flexibility for other fields like KeyId or SigningAlgorithm.

---

119-127: VerifyData is delegated similarly.
Returns api.KmsVerifyDataV1Response. Consistent usage with the other calls.

---

129-137: ListSigningAlgorithms leverages the single-purpose API.
Method returns a list of algorithms directly, preserving the server’s response shape. Straightforward approach.

---

139-147: GetPublicKey retrieves the string from the API.
Returns the PublicKey field from res with minimal overhead.

---

175-177: Keys() method defers creation lazily.
The function re-initializes KmsKeys on each call but can rely on an internal pointer approach. Fine for typical usage.

---

179-181: Signing() method follows the same pattern as Keys().
Provides a consistent approach for obtaining the signing interface.

---

183-189: NewKms constructor organizes the client and sub-interfaces.
Initialization approach is straightforward and consistent with the rest of the code.

packages/api/kms/models.go (12)

20-20: No visible code changes on line 20
It appears to be an empty or whitespace change.

---

34-39: Ensure consistent base64 usage for signature
KmsVerifyDataV1Request states Data must be base64-encoded. Please confirm if Signature also requires base64 encoding, and consider adding a clarifying comment or validation.

---

41-45: Looks good
Definition for KmsVerifyDataV1Response is clear and straightforward.

---

47-49: Straightforward structure
The request is concise and appears correct for listing signing algorithms by key.

---

51-53: No issues found
KmsListSigningAlgorithmsV1Response looks clear.

---

55-57: All good
KmsGetPublicKeyV1Request is self-explanatory; the KeyId is appropriately modeled.

---

82-84: Straightforward response
KmsCreateKeyV1Response is clearly structured.

---

86-88: LGTM
KmsDeleteKeyV1Request is concise and matches typical patterns for delete requests.

---

90-92: No issues
KmsDeleteKeyV1Response properly returns the deleted key details.

---

94-97: General request
KmsGetKeyByNameV1Request is well-defined for retrieving keys by name within a project.

---

99-102: Looks correct
KmsGetKeyByIdV1Request structures the parameters for retrieving keys by ID.

---

104-106: All good
KmsGetKeyV1Response properly wraps the returned KmsKey.

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 480a04a and 121ae1b.

• kms.go (2 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/get_key_by_name.go (1 hunks)
• packages/api/kms/models.go (1 hunks)

packages/api/kms/get_key_by_name.go (1)

19-25: Error handling is consistent with the project's pattern.

The function correctly wraps typical request and response errors using NewRequestError and NewAPIErrorWithResponse. This aligns with existing error-handling conventions in the codebase, providing clear context for debugging.

kms.go (4)

9-23: Type aliases provide clarity.

Aliasing API request structs (e.g. KmsSignDataOptions) makes the code more readable and avoids lengthy references. This approach preserves strong typing and is easy to maintain.

---

87-95: Positive separation of concerns for GetByName.

Using a dedicated method to retrieve a key by name keeps the interface specific and reduces confusion with other retrieval logic (e.g., by ID). This maintains good clarity, especially when working with different key identification schemes.

---

163-169: Expose Keys() and Signing() for flexible usage.

Returning concrete interface implementations from Keys() and Signing() is a clean way to modularize KMS functionalities. This design fosters good layering and easy discovery within client code.

---

172-176: Constructor approach aligns with standard Go patterns.

NewKms instantiates “keys” and “signing” sub-clients, encouraging compositional usage. This pattern ensures future expansions can be neatly integrated.

packages/api/kms/models.go (2)

104-114: Good coverage of key properties.

The KmsKey struct captures a wide range of attributes, including usage type, encryption algorithm, and organizational details. This thorough approach likely supports essential KMS interactions without further expansions.

---

21-26:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Confirm correct base64 usage for the Data field.

When IsDigest is false, ensure that calling code consistently base64-encodes the full payload. Otherwise, double-encoding or raw data usage might lead to signature errors at runtime.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Searches for call sites of KmsSignDataV1Request
# and checks if the 'Data' field is base64-encoded.
rg -A 3 'KmsSignDataV1Request'

Length of output: 816

---

Action Required: Validate Base64 Encoding for Data Field

• In packages/api/kms/models.go (lines 21–26), the KmsSignDataV1Request struct includes a Data field that should be base64-encoded when IsDigest is false.
• In the call site CallKmsSignDataV1 (in packages/api/kms/sign_data.go), please ensure that the full payload is properly base64-encoded before the request is sent. Failure to do so could result in either double-encoding or passing raw data, leading to signature errors at runtime.