-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.3k
Bump [email protected] #23283
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Bump [email protected] #23283
Conversation
| "temp": "0.9.2", | ||
| "text-buffer": "^13.18.5", | ||
| "timecop": "https://www.atom.io/api/packages/timecop/versions/0.36.2/tarball", | ||
| "tree-sitter": "0.17.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0.19.0
| "temp": "0.9.2", | ||
| "text-buffer": "^13.18.5", | ||
| "timecop": "https://www.atom.io/api/packages/timecop/versions/0.36.2/tarball", | ||
| "tree-sitter": "0.17.1", |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Hi @sadick254. Can the community do anything to help move this along? I don't know my way around too much, but I was just able to do the following on my local copy of atom:
(Step # 3 was easy for the most part, but the If this is the case (ie that Atom is fundamentally compatible w/ tree-sitter 0.20.0), does this mean that the only thing holding back progress on updating If this coordination between Atom and language packages is a concern, would it make sense to do an interim step, like:
Would this address any concerns, or just raise new ones? 😄 What are your thoughts on a plan to move forward? Thank you! See also #22130, #23068, atom/language-ruby#296, atom/language-html#256, atom/language-json#84, atom/language-php#438, and others |
|
linking to #22129 Although it seems there is now tree-sitter v20 instead of v19, so the markdown document is outdated |
|
Thank you, @icecream17. That document (and the repo) are a gold mine! I had failed to understand that some of the languages are already updated but that Atom hasn't been updated to use them. Also, I forgot that many of the tree-sitter grammars don't have any tests, so even if the package is updated, it might not necessarily fail tests or in CI; so long as it's not tagged for release into Atom until Atom is updated. So, based on that document, Oh, it might be worth mentioning Thanks again! |
No description provided.