Skip to content

feat: support Storage Box Types #527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jooola
Copy link
Member

@jooola jooola commented Aug 7, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.11%. Comparing base (86d3e0a) to head (06ad6c7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on storage-boxes.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           storage-boxes     #527      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          96.05%   96.11%   +0.06%     
=================================================
  Files                 64       67       +3     
  Lines               2937     2989      +52     
=================================================
+ Hits                2821     2873      +52     
  Misses               116      116              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jooola jooola force-pushed the storage-boxes-crud-storage-boxes-type branch from c1524a0 to 3c46088 Compare August 7, 2025 16:26
@jooola jooola mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2025
11 tasks
@jooola jooola merged commit 43d0606 into hetznercloud:storage-boxes Aug 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@jooola jooola deleted the storage-boxes-crud-storage-boxes-type branch August 11, 2025 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants