-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
LDM Migration #12852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LDM Migration #12852
Conversation
Test Results - Preflight, Unit21 980 tests - 12 20 246 ✅ - 12 6m 24s ⏱️ -3s Results for commit f1a6ae9. ± Comparison against base commit 476e7f3. This pull request removes 12 tests.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap 5 files 5 suites 2h 19m 3s ⏱️ Results for commit f1a6ae9. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
90030a5
to
6bc6c40
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Good work starting to decouple it. In the future, we might want to get rid of mentions of LDM altogether, and generalize the hooks and patches, but for now I think this is a good compromise!
if ldm.IS_LDM_ENABLED: | ||
# The value is set to a default high value to ensure eventual termination. | ||
timeout_seconds = DEFAULT_LAMBDA_DEBUG_MODE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | ||
timeout_seconds = ldm.DEFAULT_LDM_TIMEOUT_SECONDS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could further decouple this in the future, by making it more generic, and avoid mentioning LDM altogether. I think this is fine for now though!
I was trying to rebase this PR but was facing conflicts. |
6e88c41
to
f1a6ae9
Compare
/cc @alexrashed
Motivation
Carries out the migration of the LDM.
Changes
Removed LDM modules and introduced needed integrations to support the migration.