Skip to content

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 2, 2023

I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want assert_type.
(cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu [email protected]


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--104084.org.readthedocs.build/

I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.

I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`.
(cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood merged commit 3e7e50e into python:3.11 May 2, 2023
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-82ba6ce-3.11 branch May 2, 2023 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants