Skip to content

Conversation

erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland commented May 7, 2023

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @erlend-aasland for commit 7e628db 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots Test PR w/ refleak buildbots; report in status section label May 7, 2023
@@ -771,7 +768,7 @@ PyInit__io(void)
state->PyBufferedIOBase_Type);

// PyRawIOBase_Type(PyIOBase_Type) subclasses
state->PyBytesIOBuffer_Type = (PyTypeObject *)Py_NewRef(&_PyBytesIOBuffer_Type);
ADD_TYPE(m, state->PyBytesIOBuffer_Type, &bytesiobuf_spec, NULL); // XXX: should be subclass of PyRawIOBase_Type?
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, I'll remove the XXX comment and move this line up to 753 when the refleak CI comes out green.

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI including refleak bots are all green. I'll resolve my remark from #104264 (comment) and enable automerge.

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland enabled auto-merge (squash) May 7, 2023 13:32
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland merged commit 7a7eaff into python:main May 7, 2023
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland deleted the isolate-io/bytesiobuf branch May 7, 2023 14:20
jbower-fb pushed a commit to jbower-fb/cpython that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review after the merge: LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants