Skip to content

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 3, 2022

In very rare circumstances the JUMP opcode could be confused with the
argument of the opcode in the "then" part which doesn't end with the
JUMP opcode. This led to incorrect detection of the final JUMP opcode
and incorrect calculation of the size of the subexpression.

NOTE: Changed return value of functions _validate_inner() and
_validate_charset() in Modules/_sre/sre.c. Now they return 0 on success,
-1 on failure, and 1 if the last op is JUMP (which usually is a failure).
Previously they returned 1 on success and 0 on failure.
(cherry picked from commit e9ac890)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]

…onGH-98764)

In very rare circumstances the JUMP opcode could be confused with the
argument of the opcode in the "then" part which doesn't end with the
JUMP opcode. This led to incorrect detection of the final JUMP opcode
and incorrect calculation of the size of the subexpression.

NOTE: Changed return value of functions _validate_inner() and
_validate_charset() in Modules/_sre/sre.c.  Now they return 0 on success,
-1 on failure, and 1 if the last op is JUMP (which usually is a failure).
Previously they returned 1 on success and 0 on failure.
(cherry picked from commit e9ac890)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit eb023a8 into python:3.11 Nov 3, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-e9ac890-3.11 branch November 3, 2022 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants